|
|||||||||||||||
|
10 January 2005 Prisoners: if you can't torture them, what are they good for? I pointed my Google into the web with instructions to find articles about "Saddam torture". Following is a short sample of what came back:
Now it's time for you to play the www.Stopdubya.com FUN QUIZ. Under the definition of torture so willingly provided and eloquently stated by soon-to-be-approved Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, which one of the acts listed in the section above is actually considered to be torture? There is a rich collection of sadistic acts there, including amputation, electric shock to the genitals, breaking wrists with a bat, burning with cigarettes, and various forms of degradation, humiliation, and fear. The clock is ticking, ticking, ticking… OK, time's up! If you guessed NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE CONSIDERED TORTURE BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, go to the head of your class. Also not considered torture are mock executions, Russian Roulette, repeated drowning and revival, hanging by the wrists and beating with sticks, bats, whips, chains, or whatever, putting the prisoner in a cell next to another prisoner being tortured for hours and telling them they're next, siccing the police dogs, punching teeth out of mouths, sodomy with any handy foreign object, withholding food, water, sleep, or anything else. According to Gonzoles, you can even strip the prisoners and have them led about the cell block like dogs. OK… I might have stretched it a bit, Gonzales could possibly frown on throwing someone off of a 3 story building because they might actually DIE from that… one of the limits he puts on torture. But if you don't kill them or harm them in any way equivalent to killing an organ, then pretty much ANYTHING GOES. By now, you may be asking yourself "What's the difference between what Saddam did to the Iraqis and what the Bush Administration is doing to the Iraqis?" Well, you're not the only ones who are asking that question. And if you think it's only Abu Ghraib and Gitmo, you are sadly mistaken. The Bush Administration has actively pursued a policy of torturing prisoners, sometimes TO DEATH, at 30 camps around the world. In fact they have shipped prisoners to other countries like Egypt and Israel to be tortured when they ran out of torture capacity. The 2004 election proved to the world that Americans support the illegal, immoral, and unnecessary war on Iraq… a war of choice that didn't need to be fought. The act of approving Gonzales as Attorney General will tell the world that the US is a nation that endorses a policy of torture. That's the wrong message to send, isn't it? Is that how YOU want to be viewed by the rest of the world? |
||||||||||||||